this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
124 points (93.1% liked)

PC Gaming

7422 readers
5 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChoamNomsky@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you care about skins you deserve to pay.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Forty dollars? Tell Blizzard what, when a non-canon reference skin pack priced at the same value of three months of sub to my MMO of choice can mirror the quality and constant usability of the money spent at the MMO, maybe then we'll talk about 'deserve'-- but as it stands? This is just another avaricious grasping from a flailing company, long past its prime, long past having worn out its welcome, and ready to die.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

D3 and OW1 were $40 each, and they were worth the money. This is like selling overpriced crack to addicts that have no alternatives. Some people will pay, and Blizzard doesn't deserve the money.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

While normally I'd shudder to even up Paladins in regular gaming conversation with the state that's in right now... Even Paladins is better than the husk that OW2 became.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run -4 points 2 years ago

Yeah man, everything can just look like Dwarf Fortress, graphics mean nothing, visual variety and progression in a game add no substance or perceived enjoyment /s