26
submitted 1 year ago by herrwoland@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Alternatively, all of nature can be explained by mathematics, rather then being based on it.

[-] SwallowsDick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I was gonna say, mathematics is the human interpretation of naturally occurring proportions

[-] herrwoland@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One, Mathematics is the language of nature. Two, Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. Three: If you graph the numbers of any system, patterns emerge. Therefore, there are patterns everywhere in nature.

Edit: it's a quote from this excellent movie, pi: https://youtu.be/yRjkQT9xLZs

[-] quazar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eh, no. Mathematics is an hallucination of ours we are trying to desperately map onto reality. I say this as a mathematician. When you look out into our reality, you know what we see? A curved universe. There is nothing in our reality that is truely STRAIGHT.

YET, we creatures came up with such an unnatural thing as a straight line. Straight lines are a uniquely human hallucination. Its the logic we use to make sense of the world, but its a Rorschach test of our own making. You are attaching meaning to it because thats what our brains do. generate meaning out of chaos.

I need to look no further than pi, which is a number that represents our feeble attempts to push the round universe into our square heads. Its trying to represent the curved universe as a straight line (and visavers) - and reality said : LOL, NOPE!! YOU get a number that is more illusive than the irrationals. A never ending non patterned number.

All of nature is not based on mathematics. Mathematics is the language we use to describe nature. Thats like saying the Grand Canyon is BASED on book describing the Grand Canyon.

1.) No its not. Its our language, not nature's.

2.) To a degree, yes. But thats because our brains are pattern seeking and pattern generating machines - not because nature follows a system WE made up.

3.) Did I mention Pi yet

Here

https://i.imgur.com/a5ueCi5.jpg

THIS is a graph of a discovery that I made in number theory. Does it look like it has a pattern to you? I think this is the most beautiful thing I've ever seen, because IT MAKES NO SENSE. which means, we still have a lot to discover and learn

[-] SwallowsDick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

draws a straight line

"Fuck you, God"

[-] quazar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I ❤️ this so much. Thank you 😁

[-] Pitri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

mathematics is a human language/system.

nature just follows the laws and quirks this universe has. the plants, animals and subatomic particles will keep doing the same, regardless if we have a tool or theory that can describe what they're doing.

sure, there are patterns everywhere in nature, but i would not go as far as to say that that makes mathematics a language of nature.

[-] Buttermilk@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I would say there is no language of nature; there are things that happen, and we can approximate what happens using math. Math can be used to describe basically anything, so the fact that we can understand these things through numbers is not extraordinary.

[-] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I would say all language are natural. Even mathematics.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 year ago

Esperanto, Volapük and Elvish beg to differ 😛

[-] sauerkraus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Art and humour are inevitable consequences of sentient animals having the capability to create them.

I think of it like squares and rectangles. Everything created by humans is natural, but only a fraction of natural things are created by humans.

There is a natural progression from some particles colliding at the beginning of the universe all the way to low effort memes being posted on Lemmy.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 year ago

You're operating with a RIDICULOUSLY overbroad definition of "natural" that includes pretty much everything artificial 🤦

[-] sauerkraus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Is it not natural for humans to create artificial tools?

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
26 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45656 readers
602 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS