44
DaVinci Resolve Support
(lemdro.id)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)
Linux
47364 readers
1060 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I would try a transcode to DNxHR, it's much quicker to edit with anyways since it's optimized for that. h264/265 is ridiculously resource intensive to edit.
How much bigger are the file sizes? I've transcoded to ProRes previously and that was on average 6x bigger
Here's the bitrate table: https://avidtech.my.salesforce-sites.com/pkb/articles/en_US/White_Paper/DNxHR-Codec-Bandwidth-Specifications
Keep in mind these are listed in MB/s, so multiply by 8 to get Mb/s if you're used to that number. HQ/HQX in UHD 29.97 for example is about 6.2GB per minute, or 375GB per hour.
How much bigger depends on your source footage, if you're recording in say UHD 29.97 10 bit 4:2:2 at 400Mbps, then the DNxHR HQX version would be about double the size.
You can just remove the DNxHR proxies when done so the space isn't being taken up.