1063
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I always assumed that NPCs represented mroe than one actual citizen, because otherwise the world would become far to cluttered, and teh system requirements far to high to manage literally thousands of NPCs that exist for no reason.

[-] vind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's also been Bethesda's MO that every named NPC has to have a quest associated with them.

[-] Ravaja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's just not true and I don't know what dimension you pulled that out of

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can't think of a single named NPC which is not a part of some quest in Skyrim. Can you?

[-] Ravaja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're aware nearly every npc has a name I wager? Those who aren't are typically guards or bandits, half the NPCs in any given tavern have names but don't have quests associated with them

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I recall ages ago having read a theory about this concept of compression. That most game worlds that we see aren't literal, but rather are compressions of the world that characters experience. A city that we see might have just 5 streets, but that's just the city being compressed to a manageable size. For what characters experience, there'd be hundreds of streets. And same thing for NPCs, as you put it. We mostly only see the important NPCs and a small sample of others, but there's many NPCs that really are there for story telling purposes, they just aren't shown.

It's a really good technique if pulled off well. After all, it's really hard to have cities in game. You have to do something to limit it. Either padding it out, making most of it unvisitable, "compressing" it, or... just not having cities. Every option has downsides, but at least the compression approach optimizes for gameplay and your time.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Exactly.

We don't actually want big, vast cities.

Starfield proves that with New Atlantis. Its annoyingly huge, spread out pointlessly (for gameplay purposes, obviously a capital city is going to be huge lore/realistically), and is all around irritating to find stuff in.. As an example

We want cities that feel big and vast, while being manageable and navigable for players playing a game.

We want cities that feel that are full of life and bristling with NPCs, without actually having so many NPCs that that you'd need a cray supercomputer to process it all.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1063 points (98.4% liked)

Gaming

3176 readers
155 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS