Thought for the day.

When you read something that hits your confirmation bias button; do you look for competing views?

e.g. I just started reading "Ultra-processed people, the science behind food that isn't food" the amount of confirmation bias is truly staggering; I haven't had it like this in the past. A lot of the points are written down what I have been thinking for years (decades even).

I feel like I need to look for a competing view to check my existing bias, the author has done some of this and basically calls out the competing views as compromised by conflict of interest from the food industry.