this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39791 readers
287 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Cars aren't automation, but you already know that. And despite what Elon says, they still require a driver to be operated (although that will probably change soon and remove 15% of jobs in the process). I'm not saying all advances in technology are bad. But things that will replace entire workforces, like how this will replace ground crews, have a negative affect.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 19 points 2 years ago

Cars absolutely are automation. They put stable workers out of jobs. No more horses to feed, no more stalls to much out. A single gas station attendant can serve hundreds of cars a week. Entire workforces were replaced with the adoption of cars.

Stopping automation is not the solution. Universal Basic Income is the solution.

[–] Dr_Cog@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

It won't replace entire ground crews, because the machines will break down. You'll need someone to service them, and a small team to act in case there are no backups.