133
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stifle867@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and when the question posed was open to so much interpretation everyone has their own idea of what they voted yes/no for. It wasn't like the "gay marriage yes or no" referendum that was clearly understood by most people. Such a mistake to call it "the voice". Isn't that a TV show?

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 6 points 1 year ago

the “gay marriage yes or no” referendum

Small nitpick: it was a plebiscite - not a referendum. Our marriage laws aren't contained in the Constitution, so a referendum wasn't required.

[-] stifle867@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Didn't even realise that, thank you.

[-] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 2 points 1 year ago

With the sheer volume of political nonsense surrounding the question at the time, it sure felt like a referendum!

Haha, it was a mistake to call it the Voice. I'm waiting for the Got Talent commission to get going.

Unfortunately the nature of the constitution meaned that it needed to be a bit vague. But that was always one of its strengths. Over time, as life changes, the nation isn't codified into too strict a system. The Voice reflected that essence very well.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
133 points (92.9% liked)

Australian Politics

1287 readers
42 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS