76
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ijeff@lemdro.id 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is true for any health system (labour and technology costs are huge components to health care, even in systems with universal coverage). However, there are also huge and significant costs inherent to any system that doesn't provide universal coverage (e.g., people delaying care leading to more severe illness costlier to respond to). Private insurance systems also introduce significant cost pressures even for non-profit and publicly funded providers by driving up staffing costs and requiring more support staff to operate.

All this to say, the US doesn't have a budget problem when it comes to health care - the primary obstacle is the policy challenge of switching to a system that does a better job at delivering care for everyone based on need rather than ability/willingness to pay. Massive cost savings follow when people are kept healthier.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

My point is the money isn't actually being spent on labor or technology - it's just going into shareholders pockets.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
76 points (96.3% liked)

World News

32363 readers
281 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS