GenZedong

4616 readers

51 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml

Elara@lemmygrad.ml

American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml

NYT spreading sinophobia and warmongering as usual (archive.ph)

submitted 2 years ago by LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Only China is an arguable peer of the United States, only China’s technological and industrial might can hope to match our own, and only China has the capacity to project power globally as well as regionally."

"China offers a somewhat coherent ideological alternative to the liberal-democratic order."

"China’s one-party meritocracy can advertise itself (...) as a successor to democratic capitalism, an alternative model for the developing world."

"The establishment of Chinese military pre-eminence in East Asia would be a unique geopolitical shock, with dire effects on the viability of America’s alliance systems (...) and on our ability to maintain the global trading system that undergirds our prosperity at home."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] relay@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

All of this implies that China is a socialist leaning nation that is growing in industrial power that everyone wants to trade with.

I think it is strange that they think that China offering better deals in over-exploited nations to be less exploited is a threat to prosperity at home.

The profits of the large corporations would be impacted but delivering services could still function without hurting consumers if corporate profits are high enough.

[–] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago

You're overthinking it. For the NYT, "The profits of the large corporations would be impacted" = "threat to prosperity at home".