428
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EurekaStockade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why do you carry tools around with you all day? Do you also carry a hammer, reciprocating saw, spirit level or tape measure?

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Glances around at all the people I know who carry pocket knives and multi tools.

Then again I wouldn't call a gun a tool when it's purpose is to maim and kill. Like sure technically it is correct but most people carry tools for utility reasons not that.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I can cut an apple with a pocket knife at least.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Well, a gun can turn the apple into apple-sauce.

[-] EurekaStockade@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right? I'm actually sympathetic towards the "gun is a tool" argument. I grew up on a farm and have been hunting, I can relate.

And those people who carry pocket knives and multi tools (and as a technician, I'm one of them) are presumably often encountering situations where those tools are useful. What are the situations where a gun is useful? What is the kind of job that tool is designed for?

I'm convinced that it's at least a little bit about the "OMG A GUN feeling". I don't see people walking around the street with a ball peen hammer holstered to their belt.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I grew up surrounded by farms ain't no one carrying around a pistol at their hip to shoot gophers. We got a rifle and/or a shotty either held in the hand or in the tractor or truck.

That said I'm not in the US.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I grew up on a farm too and I can say that I didn't know of any farmer who carried a gun with them. I spent a lot of time at different farms. Guns all stayed back at the house.

[-] rockstarmode@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

I gave other examples of "tools" like a watch or a wallet. Tools are just a means of getting things done, and aren't in of themselves good or evil. Some tools are more dangerous than others, just like some jobs are more dangerous than others.

Trained and responsible adults do dangerous jobs, often with dangerous tools, in public, all the time. Similarly millions of law abiding Americans legally carry pistols every day, and you'd be surprised how little crime they commit with their tools compared to the overall public.

But that's probably not what this crowd wants to hear, and that's ok. I'm just chiming in to lend a perspective that might not be the status quo in places like this.

[-] crimroy@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

This excuse always makes me laugh, "it's just a tool, like a hammer". Well, a hammer could hit someone in the head, but it's designed to hit nails. A gun does... What? Shoots people or animals. You're an idiot.

[-] rockstarmode@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but it doesn't do that without someone pulling the trigger.

What you've done is assume either the tool has agency of its own, or that humans can only use this tool for negative purposes.

What I said was that those things are patently untrue, and provided examples of how >6 million pistols are legally carried by civilians in the US every day, and how those civilians are far less likely than regular public to commit gun crimes.

This is kind of a tautology because the legal carry folks are both:

  • legally allowed to acquire a firearm (ruling out prohibited persons like people with prior criminal histories) and in many cases they've
  • gone through even more extensive background checks and rigorous training

But I also acknowledge that some folks don't think those facts are significant, I'm just sorry this resorted to name calling.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're arguing in bad faith. A concealed weapon has exactly one purpose: defense by the use of deadly force, or brandishing.

[-] rockstarmode@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Defense with justifiable deadly force (as a last resort) is not evil or bad. I appreciate that you agree that there's a good reason for millions of law abiding people to be armed.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
428 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS