this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
453 points (99.6% liked)

196

18203 readers
2445 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember, the social Democrats sided with the Nazis over the socialists. They’ve done it every time they’ve been given the opportunity, and will continue to do so as many times as people fall for their shtick.

“The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house."
-Audre Lorde

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

allowing those individuals to make What should be collective decisions

What should be collective decisions?

he still pollutes

Not invariably, if you charge him for it and have sufficient enforcement, the pollution will be incidental.

you give property itself rights

Please explain, I don't see how ownership does that.

without violent enforcement?

That'll be inevitable either way, if nothing else to prevent assault.

co-opting the very violent enforcers for their own means ... or purchasing the regulators and regulatory bodies

By making a democracy structure that is minimally influenced by money by highly valuing the opinion of the people and heavily regulating campaign contributions.

inevitable outcome of the system

Please point to those. Seems to me like you get cycles of increasing and decreasing capital control.