452
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Remember, the social Democrats sided with the Nazis over the socialists. They’ve done it every time they’ve been given the opportunity, and will continue to do so as many times as people fall for their shtick.

“The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house."
-Audre Lorde

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

allowing those individuals to make What should be collective decisions

What should be collective decisions?

he still pollutes

Not invariably, if you charge him for it and have sufficient enforcement, the pollution will be incidental.

you give property itself rights

Please explain, I don't see how ownership does that.

without violent enforcement?

That'll be inevitable either way, if nothing else to prevent assault.

co-opting the very violent enforcers for their own means ... or purchasing the regulators and regulatory bodies

By making a democracy structure that is minimally influenced by money by highly valuing the opinion of the people and heavily regulating campaign contributions.

inevitable outcome of the system

Please point to those. Seems to me like you get cycles of increasing and decreasing capital control.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
452 points (99.6% liked)

196

16432 readers
1933 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS