this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
246 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

73495 readers
3200 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers have devised an attack that forces Apple’s Safari browser to divulge passwords, Gmail message content, and other secrets by exploiting a side channel vulnerability in the A- and M-series CPUs running modern iOS and macOS devices.

iLeakage, as the academic researchers have named the attack, is practical and requires minimal resources to carry out. It does, however, require extensive reverse-engineering of Apple hardware and significant expertise in exploiting a class of vulnerability known as a side channel, which leaks secrets based on clues left in electromagnetic emanations, data caches, or other manifestations of a targeted system. The side channel in this case is speculative execution, a performance enhancement feature found in modern CPUs that has formed the basis of a wide corpus of attacks in recent years. The nearly endless stream of exploit variants has left chip makers—primarily Intel and, to a lesser extent, AMD—scrambling to devise mitigations.

. . .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The exploit works on any browser on an iPhone or iPad...

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because Apple are pieces of shit which force Safari to underpin any Web interaction on those devices, which wouldn't be such a problem if mobile Safari were worth a damn.

But you're right and it's a valid point. I did miss that sentence on initial read and had forgotten about that problem. Thanks for the reminder!

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It also said this hasn’t actually ever been exploited. So, looks like they’ll collect the bounty and move on. Bugs are bugs.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cha-ching! Good for those researchers, get that bag. It's much better than finding out the other way.

I'm still not calling it iLeakage though. They'll have to make do with the well-deserved cash.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Can we call it pre-hack juice?