257
Prompt: mario as frodo in lotr
Steps: 20, Sampler: DPM++ 3M SDE Karras, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 1812310192, Size: 768x1280, Model hash: 74dda471cc, Model: realvisxlV20_v20Bakedvae, Clip skip: 2, RNG: CPU, Version: v1.6.0
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
257 points (93.0% liked)
AI Generated Images
7145 readers
205 users here now
Community for AI image generation. Any models are allowed. Creativity is valuable! It is recommended to post the model used for reference, but not a rule.
No explicit violence, gore, or nudity.
This is not a NSFW community although exceptions are sometimes made. Any NSFW posts must be marked as NSFW and may be removed at any moderator's discretion. Any suggestive imagery may be removed at any time.
Refer to https://lemmynsfw.com/ for any NSFW imagery.
No misconduct: Harassment, Abuse or assault, Bullying, Illegal activity, Discrimination, Racism, Trolling, Bigotry.
AI Generated Videos are allowed under the same rules. Photosensitivity warning required for any flashing videos.
To embed images type:
“”
Follow all sh.itjust.works rules.
Community Challenge Past Entries
Related communities:
- !auai@programming.dev
Useful general AI discussion - !aiphotography@lemmings.world
Photo-realistic AI images - !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Art
- !share_anime_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com Stable Diffusion Anime Art
- !botart@lemmy.dbzer0.com AI art generated through bots
- !degenerate@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW weird and surreal images - !aigen@lemmynsfw.com
NSFW AI generated porn
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"This is mine" Hilarious.
Yeah, as in the one he got as a result from the prompts. What you're doing is like someone saying "post cool photos you've taken of mountains, this is mine:" and your reaction to that is "That's not your mountain! >:("
You're deliberately adding meaning where there is none. Stop being a piece of shit for no reason.
No my reaction is that this person thinks the end result of typing in some text is the same thing as learning to draw or paint over years and honing those skills to create actual art. But what should I expect from some shitty little fuck who has the reading comprehension of a tree stump. The only thing you've probably ever created is a fucking headache to the poor souls forced to interact with you.
The "nothing but oil and brushes" gang is almost comical if it wasn't insulting. The AI hand wringers sound exactly like the people I remember from when Photoshop started getting more popular.
They're all just tools.
I for one am glad there are public models available instead of another corporate dystopia.
Lol ok... All these big companies like Disney using AI art in their movies and shows are keeping people from working. Just because you're able to make what I assume is furry porn and support yourself that way doesn't make you an expert, and it certainly doesn't give your fucking stupid opinion on the matter any weight whatsoever.
So, in conclusion, go fuck yourself too!
ThE lEgItImAcY oF aRt!!! Fuck off. I'm allowed to have my thoughts and opinions just as much as you do.
Maybe it'd be better not to grade forms of art.
Point to where OP said this, or admit you're being a crybaby over a problem that exists exclusively in your head
Oh for fucks sake, get off Lemmy you absolute loser cretin. No one fucking cares about your bullshit holier-than-thou take on anything. If you really think it's so easy, show us what you can do with AI, or would you have to...learn how to use it first?
It is the equivalent. You wasted your life learning an obsolete skill. Now you're bitter about it and shaking your cane at the kids on your lawn.
Lol what the fuck kind of bullshit are you spewing? Lol oh my God are you serious? You're going to bat for technology trained on that "obsolete" skill, illegally mind you, and then you're going to call me old. This is literally one of the dumbest takes I've seen on the Internet.
Traditional art is finished everyone! This fucking moronic man-child said so!
I'm not the one bitching about being replaced
You have nothing to offer that's worth replacing.
You know me so well ❤️🩹
Just FYI you not agreeing with something doesn't make it illegal.
And I didn't call you old, I called you an angry sad man who needs to flex the smallest amount of authority he has left. Yelling at kids in your lawn.
Yeah these AI art companies aren't currently being sued for illegally using copyrighted art to train their bots, eh?
Oh sure you didn't imply old man at all... That makes sense though because you have no point.
Being sued doesn't mean shit until they're charged.
My point is you're either downvote trolling or I pity you
If you mattered at all to me then your pity might mean something
And if you mattered to anyone you wouldn't be acting like a sad angry man yelling at kids on his lawn
You can make one that's yours too! Just a few clicks away. No need to rain on anyone's parade.
As an artist, you're right. I can make my own with skills I've developed over years of practice.
And I imagine you are using some tools as well? Whether they be physical paint/brush/canvas/etc or digital ones?
Few artists are producing art out of thin air, using a tool to aid in the process is a natural part of creating art
How is typing in some words and having a system of stolen artwork spit out an image even remotely the same thing?
I'm not really saying it is, I'm just unsure where that line is.
Modifying existing artwork to make something new has always been a thing.
Is there a point where Photoshop might become too easy to use and then anyone using it is no longer an artist?
One could certainly argue that creating anything of actual value with AI does require a certain level of skill. That skill may be less of an artistic one and more of a technical one, but software developers also have value, even when the tools they use make it much easier than it was in the past.
I guess what I'm getting at is while I agree with you there's a large gap between having the skill to create art yourself with a paintbrush and coaxing an AI into doing most of the work for you, I'm not sure it's so black and white and the line is only going to get blurrier.
He's just full of shit anyhow, AI doesn't just magically give you what you want, and it definitely requires both skills to use and a good eye for art to know what is good and what is bad. Beyond that if other people who use AI are anything like me, it's not a one and done situation, I often take an image from Photoshop to AI and back again tweaking things to get the image just right, it can take a LONG time to get a finished product. I don't think I've ever been happy enough with what I got straight out of the box from image or text generation that I just ran with it and didn't change anything on my own. These are powerful tools but they aren't magic and they do require a lot more work than this idiot is asserting. Maybe there's a program that does produce gold every time you hit generate, but I'm using Stable Diffusion and it's not in any way the case for me.
People said the same thing about CGI, and look where we are now.
No they didn't. That's not the same thing either.
Okay. Well, let's agree to disagree. But in 10 years, I garuntee that AI art will be a fact of life.
If I make a drawing of a character someone else created, in someone else's style, have I stolen their artwork?
If I draw Gordon Freeman in John R. Dilworth's style, what have I stolen from John?
Go back to watching football or whatever it is you dumbass centrists do when you're not complaining about nothing.