55
Could rust do with a crates.io alternative? (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/rust@programming.dev
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To me, the two major problems are:

  1. no namespaces

Someone uploads "serde2"? that's blocked forever. Someone uploads a typo version of a popular package? Too bad for you, learn how to type.

  1. the github connection

If you want to contribute to crates.io you're bound to github. No gitlab, codeberg, gitee, sourcehut, etc.

Not sure if there are any other problems, but those two seem like the biggest things and #1 is AFAIK not something they ever want to change + it would be difficult to as one would need a migration strategy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BB_C@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. That is in part why I mentioned that it's not a real alternative, and mentioned cargo-vendor as a possible basis for a less manual serviceable solution.

Serviceable, but not necessarily good still. Anti-crates.io extremists would still be better off using an alternative crates registry*.

* That's something that already exists btw. True extremists don't have to wait for the HN leak-promised Good Stuff.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
55 points (92.3% liked)

Rust

5960 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
EdTheLegendary@programming.dev
kahnclusions@programming.dev
torcherist@programming.dev