585
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 184 points 1 year ago

Lol 'lower salaries' they were never legitimately offering those salaries you boot gobbling fool

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Last place I interviewed, recruiter and I agreed with my qualifications etc I should ask for 90k. They hired someone for 67.5k with no qualifications. The person literally took a pay cut to take the job. I don't get it.

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Sounds like they hired someone unqualified cause it cost them less and the person with no qualifications took it because so would you if that was your best option.

[-] gataloca@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That's why they hate things like welfare or full employment. They need a desperate army of reserve labor to keep wages low.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
585 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
20 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS