767
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Former President Barack Obama said a way forward for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is only possible if people acknowledge the “complexity” of the situation.

“If there’s any chance of us being able to act constructively to do something, it will require an admission of complexity and maintaining what on the surface may seem contradictory ideas that what Hamas did was horrific, and there’s no justification for it. And … that the occupation and what’s happening to Palestinians is unbearable,” Obama said in an interview on the podcast “Pod Save America.”

The former president’s comments come as the Israeli military focuses its offensive against Hamas in Gaza City and northern parts of the enclave.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

A plea for nuance from the enablers and backers of the apartheid regime is not something I'm going to take on board.

I'm aware of the historical context and Israel has a right to exist and Jews to be safe. But I stand firmly with the Palestinians as the victims of generations of aggression.

[-] pleasemakesense@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The calls to nuance and complexity is insulting, like people can't see what's right infront of them and form an opinion of their own. What complexity is there in bombing hospitals, ambulances, schools and refugee camps, while denying food, water, and medical supplies to millions

[-] roboticide@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Ignoring nuance is claiming only one side is right. It's easy and borderline brainless to simply claim Israel is the only side wrong for bombing hospitals.

But this ignores that Hamas is committing war crimes by using civilian facilities as staging grounds to launch attacks on Israel. This ignores that Hamas' charter calls for the destruction of Israel, and the only thing stopping them is lack of weapons. This ignores that Hamas, the democratically elected ruling party of Gaza, has continued to use resources to attack Israel instead of building infrastructure to actually function independently.

Ignoring nuance is to ignore history. Ignoring that the West created this whole situation, by both promising one region to two peoples then creating division where there was none to make colonial rule easier, and by also so brutally attempting to wipe out an entire people it created a hardline cultural belief that swift and severe military action is necessary to insure "never again," (and two wars in '48 and '67 didn't help either).

None of this is to say Israel is innocent of wrongdoing - they sure as shit aren't and certainly seem happy to bomb 100 Palestinian civilians if it means they get 1 Hamas fighter. But rejecting nuance pushes a belief one side is right and one side is wrong, and that the only sides here are national ones. Both suck, both are morally wrong. The only "right side" is Palestinian and Israeli civilians being killed because the only "wrong side" - extremist Israeli and Palestinian leaders - are happy to kill as many civilians as possible for some acres of land.

But please, do tell me how my opinion is wrong and there's no complexity here.

[-] satan@r.nf 1 points 11 months ago

There's nuance to everything but when war criminals like this and other US president speak about it, it loses any shred of credibility. It's like asking a dictator with a PR team about something that's happening half way across the globe. Of course they're going to say include vaguely valid points to take a higher ground.

Take him to hague with rest of the crew and put him on a trial. I'll want to hear what nuance opinions he has about that.

[-] HotTakesColdUrine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly if the Jews in the Warsaw ghetto didn't want to get wiped out like that, they shouldn't have rebelled. Their hands weren't clean.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I think the nuance is understanding the evils of the Israeli state without blaming Jews or endorsing violence against Israeli civilians. You aren't doing that here, but lots of people are doing this right now (the people "forming an opinion on their own" aren't always forming great opinions). Anyone suggesting that nuance is unnecessary is begging you to only see their side of things. There are zero issues in the world that don't require some degree of nuance; why you would think such a complex and long-standing conflict like this one is better without critical thinking is the real insult here.

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It's weird that Obama is being nuanced here, yet the US has been unwavering in supporting Israel, including during Obama's term. Maybe his stance has changed. Or maybe it's easy for him to say things when he doesn't have to act on it at all. Talk is cheap, after all.

[-] HotTakesColdUrine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People have a right to be safe but no state has a right to exist, let alone a state defined by being a settler colonial project.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe I could agree with you, but they did face an injustice like no other. They have a right to a homeland but it should never have been Israel.

[-] HotTakesColdUrine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What the hell does 'right to a homeland' mean?

[-] satan@r.nf 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Where's the homeland to rest of the genocides around the world? let's bring in Uyghur population to Israel too, Rohingya Muslims? Ugandan genocide?

When are they going to get their own homeland?

oh oh but this one is so much more special because it ties in with your religious beliefs in the west, right?

the rest? they just can fucking just get wiped out for all you care.

lose the facade you ducking hypocrites.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Man fuck off, that was a lot of shite you typed. I don't have religious beliefs for one and you can scroll through my history to see my strong support for Palestine.

Fuck you.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
767 points (94.7% liked)

World News

38987 readers
1867 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS