this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
200 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

73495 readers
3524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s about respecting creators

Is it, though? Copyright holders and creators are completely different things.

Before you can pay those copyright holders their capital income, you have to know who they are. Which means you can't just download random pictures of the internet. You need pictures with a known provenance. Well, it turns out that there are corporations dedicated to providing just such pictures. How lucky for them if society would choose to "respect creators" in this way. The payment to even a prolific stock photographer may be tiny, but they'd get a cut from each one.

It may not be about money for you, but the people who pay to push that talking point may have a different attitude.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

That’s a good point. You’re entirely correct. I had a much simpler idea in mind - I was only thinking of small, independent artists who posted their images online and were the copyright holders of their own work.