230
submitted 1 year ago by sv1sjp@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SamVergeudetZeit@feddit.de 47 points 1 year ago

Maybe make the bank Apps a little more intuitive to use and make it easier to send recurring payments to your friends and the monopoly of paypal in germany could disappear

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah. It's really a UI issue at this point. Just a simple frontend to facilitate SEPA transactions to contacts (which could just be a simple Name -> IBAN map stored locally)

[-] gigachad@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

I could imagine something like an IBAN protocol - open an IBAN link as in iban://AB26374838388 directly with your banking app and auto fill the bank transfer menu. Only add the amount of money you want to transfer.

No idea what other implications that would have e.g. for security though

[-] rentar42@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Oh, add an ?amount=32€ as well as a text=Pizza parameter and you're almost there ...

[-] existenzmaximum@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Separate ?amount=32 and currency=Euro to add currency support.

[-] rentar42@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I thought about that, but I think it's actually more error prone, because people might just be setting ?amount=32 and leaving out currency which might lead to unexpected behaviour. Implementors tend to interpret this differently and one app might take the default currency and the other might fail to accept it, and that kind of different behaviour is a common source of security issues. Having a single unified parameter that must always contain the value and currency "solves" that issue.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Makes it a bit more annoying to parse, though I definitely see your point.

However, you're still proposing a standard: "has to include both the currency and the amount in the parameter", so why not split them up at that point?

[-] technohacker@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Dammit we've just made UPI

[-] sergih@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Idont't think that's a good idea, too many peoplr quickly pressing pay and then they tealizef only afyer paying thay there's an extra 0

[-] rentar42@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

There's still plenty of steps that your bank app can (and will) take to verify this is as intended. Requiring the user to "parse" the URI is not scalable anyway, the app needs to present the information clearly (i.e. "Do you really want to transfer 123.45€ to IBAN abcd, you have not transferred money to this IBAN before, the IBAN indicates a bank in " where the money amount is clearly highlighted).

[-] sergih@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, still having to input the money manually is the best failsafe, how many people are used to just automatically hitting whatever button to make a message go away for example (even more with the cookies), best failsafe is inputting the money manually, you'd never mistakenly/automatically do that.

[-] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 2 points 1 year ago

You know, it's good to put failsafes and all, but at some point it's just PEBKAC.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, PEBKAC, the most common error after ID-10T.

[-] ahto@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] gigachad@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

True, my bank also supports this. I already saw QR-Codes on some invoices but never used it... will try it out next time.

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Main problem I see is that as it stands it's insanely easy to forge a SEPA mandate. Ever had to fill one out? It's literally just a piece of paper saying "I, John Doe, allow XXX to take money for services rendered from my acount AB1234. [signature]". The wonder of legacy processes built for companies with fax-based workflows...

I believe only some "trusted" commercial customers are authorized to turn in SEPA mandates (I know my ISP went into some bankruptcy proceedings and lost their ability to use their SEPA mandates for instance), but still, that makes me somewhat wary about who I give my IBAN to. I'd certainly not put it up online for anyone to see.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Didn't know it was this simple, that's stupid.

I believe though that in today's day and and of banking apps this should be very easily solvable with inapp confirmations

Let's hope the old way dies

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Alternatively, let's kill contact lists completely and do this some other way. Contact lists are already a privacy disaster, allowing users to compromise all their friends' personal information without a hint of consent.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'd suggest providing alternatives before killing the current best solution

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Speak for yourself. Speaking for myself, I don't even use my contacts app for this reason. When the "current best solution" involves telling Big Tech the identity particulars of all your friends, it is not a solution to anything. If this had not been normalized by Google and Apple 15 years ago, it would surely be illegal.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Jesus Christ then don't use it if you mind, but overall, it's the best solution for keeping track of people's phone numbers.

You're saying kill it but not offering a better choice, you'll never accomplish anything like this.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Well pardon me but "Jesus Christ" perhaps some of your friends never asked you to share their names and phone numbers with Google or anyone else just because it makes life convenient for you.

[-] cestvrai@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe I’m missing something here, don’t we already have this UI from our banking apps?

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You should push for something like BIZUM. Say what you will about Spain but we got that right.

[-] tetris11@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

I just want an easier way to give money to homeless people, without them having to depend on an electricity supply.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Maybe we could issue tokens for a given value or something like that?

[-] tetris11@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

True, but who would carry them around?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, right. It's a silly idea.

[-] Nobsi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Don't feed the troll

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Damn, how has no one done this yet?

[-] SamVergeudetZeit@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago
[-] tetris11@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

There are penalties for carrying cash. One is the time burden of withdrawing it, the other is that if your bank has fees for more than X withdrawals a month then you will be deincentivized.

[-] SamVergeudetZeit@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

how much money do you want to give to a homeless person for you needing to withdraw a high amount of cash each month?

[-] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago

I just don't want to have cash on me. My wallet is already quite a stack of cards. Two debit cards, a credit card, two vehicle registration cards, a roadside assistance membership card, a driver's license.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
230 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS