this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
109 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

72957 readers
3533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
109
I can barely tell the difference between 60 and 165 hz on my monitor (lemmy.zip)
submitted 2 years ago by Blisterexe@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title says it all (i have turned on 165hz on settings). Its a cheap monitor, do some 165hz monitors not truly give you that experience? Or are my eyes fucked

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seeing a solid color frame change is completely different from the minor changes generally occurring per frame, especially in media such as movies and games which are continuous.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Hobbit movies at 48 instead of 24 fps still looked much smoother and better.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

I vastly preferred them in 24 fps, they looked awful in 48 fps to me.