946
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Tesla will sue you for $50,000 if you try to resell your Cybertruck in the first year::Tesla may agree to buy the truck back at the original price minus "$0.25/mile driven" and any damages and repairs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Ferrari has some similar bullshit, but you agree to it in a contract when you buy the car. If you refuse they simply don't sell you the car.

(Ferrari chooses you, not the other way around)

[-] jwt@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

If you refuse they simply don't sell you the car.

Sure, question is of course: will they be able to do something about it if you agree to the terms and sell it anyway. I don't think 'breaking' an agreement based on unlawful stipulations is actionable (ianal)

[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For Ferrari, if you break their stipulations, they put you on a blacklist and won't sell you another ever again. I can't find any other hard-and-fast things they do because there's a lot of rumor milling, but barring you from purchases and ending your dealership maintenance seem to be "for sure". I imagine it comes with some other stigmas from the community too. But much like real estate covenants if you agree to something in a contract, and then break it, you're subject to civil action. In a Covenant, the contract holders are permitted to buy back your house and evict you.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If I recall correctly, Ferrari being assholes is why Lamborghini isn't just a tractor brand.

[-] GenesisJones@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That is correct

[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 1 year ago

Even at the time of the quarrels con Ferrari, Lamborghini was already producing both tractors, air conditioners and boilers.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah for the people in question (buying ferraris/teslas) that blacklisting part might be deterrence enough. Still, even in that real estate covenant construction you mention, that 'something' they stipulate cannot be unlawful I think.

[-] Raxiel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If they simply forbade resale, it would be an unenforceable term. The obligation on them to buy it back (at an agreed price) in order to enforce the term likely makes it legal.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Deadmau5 was threatened with a lawsuit over his "Purrari" Nyan cat livery.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
946 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
3072 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS