view the rest of the comments
ErgoMechKeyboards
Ergonomic, split and other weird keyboards
Rules
Keep it ergo
Posts must be of/about keyboards that have a clear delineation between the left and right halves of the keyboard, column stagger, or both. This includes one-handed (one half doesn't exist, what clearer delineation is that!?)
i.e. no regular non-split¹ row-stagger and no non-split¹ ortholinear²
¹ split meaning a separation of the halves, whether fixed in place or entirely separate, both are fine.
² ortholinear meaning keys layed out in a grid
No Spam
No excessive posting/"shilling" for commercial purposes. Vendors are permitted to promote their products/services but keep it to a minimum and use the [vendor] flair. Posts that appear to be marketing without being transparent about it will be removed.
No Buy/Sell/Trade
This subreddit is not a marketplace, please post on r/mechmarket or other relevant marketplace.
Some useful links
- EMK wiki
- Split keyboard compare tool
- Compare keycap profiles Looking for another set of keycaps - check this site to compare the different keycap profiles https://www.keycaps.info/
- Keymap database A database with all kinds of keymap layouts - some of them fits ergo keyboards - get inspired https://keymapdb.com/
You asked for help, than when presented with help got snarky. People got snarky back, now here we are.
The best example to explain it would be like, asking a doctor for help with pain and they tell you stop stabbing yourself with a fork, but you argue that you like stabbing yourself with a fork, why can’t you help me with stabbing myself with a fork?
Going to the wrong doctor, see an acupuncturist and upgrade that fork game.
I asked why? It was working for me. It doesn't mean I'm "right".
Just questioning why is not snarky. I wanted to understand the big deal. People made a big deal about that .
Just enjoy the comedy of this absolute mess of junk that happened because of a question to the community :)
Bad habits lead to larger issues over time. You also didn’t just ask why, you argued back with fallacious arguments. I was keeping it simple for brevity.
This was explained multiple times to you, and yet here we still are…
What fallacious points? I don't even get it.
We know.