32
It's Time For Progressives to Reclaim the Fourth of July
(www.politico.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
32 points (77.6% liked)
politics
18883 readers
5996 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's up to you. I genuinely didn't come in here aiming to argue with you or tell you you're not allowed to dislike this country or anything like that.
I do get it, to a certain extent. I'm just saying that there are plenty of people here who are trying to support and protect you. Slavery used to exist, women couldn't vote, police who killed people used to never go to prison, lots of things used to be true before they changed. You can either support and try to join with the people who are now trying to change things further, or you can leave for a place that really doesn't have a government and see how that works, or you can get ready for things here to get worse. Maybe way worse, yes; I won't argue with you there. Complaining and cursing at me on Lemmy won't affect that outcome though.
All of those things changed because people fought against this country. It had to be dragged kicking and screaming every step of the way, and until there is a fundamental rupture in America that is always going to be the case. I'm certainly not leaving, though! I'm right where I need to be. I just don't want to be told how great or good or likeable America is. It's not, and it's our job to make it so.
Right, I agree with pretty much all of this. I identify the people who did the dragging as "America" just as much as the evil they were fighting, so I talk about it differently, but I like what you're saying. If it makes you feel any better, I think we're coming to that fundamental rupture now, ready or not.
These people were also Americans though. They weren't outsiders. Both bigots and minorities are Americans. We can celebrate the Americans who fought repeatedly to achieve equality while condemning the bigots they had to fight against
America has in-groups and out-groups of "real" Americans and outsiders, and this stems from its legacy as a settler-colonial state; internal colonies of oppressed peoples and settlers that benefit from oppression. We have never achieved equality because this fundamental contradiction within American society persists, because it's foundational to America's government.
Of course, but it's also foundational to America itself, from the very beginning. Over time we've even seen waves of immigration go from out group to in group, like the Irish.
I just take the viewpoint that patriotism isn't blindly supporting your country. I see that as nationalism. To me, patriotism is celebrating strengths and progress, recognizing and condemning our faults, and advocating to fix those faults. It's looking out for other Americans and fighting for their rights.
Too often, I think we see America for its faults -- and there are very many of them -- and we forget that there's another America that's always tried to fix and address those faults. We can celebrate that as the true American spirit.
The "America" that's always tried to fix and address those faults is always at odds with the American government. American society only ever improves when American institutions and American society are challenged. You need to resolve that contradiction.
Stop clinging to your identity as an American. It's just lines on the map. You have more in common with a worker in Canada and Mexico than you do with your American boss.
There is ironically nothing more American than a group at odds with the government. The country was founded with great mistrust for government and an executive, to the point that the first iteration of the constitution had to be completely redone.
Yep. The founding fathers were extremely anti-government. Jefferson famously supported Shay's Rebellion; I think it's literally true that if they were around today, most of them would advocate for revolution, not protest. I think in their farmer-centric view, they would view the vast majority of modern Americans as de facto slaves, too timid to end their slavery.
It's not just ancient history, either. Something changed after the 80s, but as recently as one generation ago a lot of classically American things like "Rambo" and Bruce "Born in the USA" Springsteen actually got popular specifically because they were expressions of pure disgust at the American system. John Rambo was a homeless, psychologically destroyed veteran, abused by corrupt police, who literally fights a guerrilla war against the system. The end of the movie, if you haven't seen it, is him breaking down in a babbling, hysterical flashback to his traumatic experiences from the war, and then presumably getting arrested. There's no victory, and nothing good about the America that's represented, at the beginning, middle, or end. That's what resonated with people and elevated it to blockbuster status.
The enemy recast Rambo and "Born in the USA" as something else, so successfully that the origin is mostly erased. But the origin that America got so fiercely behind was fundamentally "anti-American," if you want to define that as meaning "against the system."
So what about the people who don't want to waste their lives trying to squeeze blood from a stone and who want a better way? Why are they not allowed to say no?
I think what I'm advocating for is the better way that you're talking about. I think. What do you mean by saying no / working for a better way?
If you're going to be that arrogant, why even bother? You already know what's best for all of us, and you'll use talking point after talking point and refuse to concede or acknowledge any good point we make to bully us into submitting to your opinion. Nah, we're good. I say no.
Why are you getting combative with me? I'm trying to agree with you right now. The ending to the argument I had with the other main interlocutor here was when I said, "I agree with pretty much all of this ... I like what you’re saying."
If you're upset because you want an argument, and for me to lose the argument, and me agreeing with you cuts that whole thing off at the pass, then IDK what to tell you.