1323
Too soon! (lemmy.world)

By Zayatoon comics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bondrewd@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Nice shoehorn of anglo-saxon history, but those famines are all plagues and crop faliures for the most part.

[-] KepBen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Why is it the rich never starve if it's just a totally unaccountable natural disaster?

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Rich usually have more resources and ability to purchase them at elevated prices. Hope that helps

[-] Bondrewd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because they have money duuh.

[-] KepBen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So it's less of a natural disaster and more of an economic disaster? I wonder why people would blame governments for that...

[-] Bondrewd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is like miles away from the intentional economical engineering we are talking about. Still not sure why you are so bent on trying to wiggle them into a comparsion between regimes and personnel more direct, intentional and immediate like Mao or Stalin.

If you dont distinguish from those, then why even have a debate on them?

The joke implied that the question intended to ask one or very few directly involved personnel and you disregarded that. Thats it.

[-] KepBen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Right sure, when the British intentionally abuse Ireland and India it's really just a whoopsie-daisy.

[-] Bondrewd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Should I really do the same kind of jumping to conclusions?

Are you saying that the largest completely man made famine ever does not really deserve that much of a recognition?

[-] KepBen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nope. I'm just saying they're all "man-made".

[-] LicenseToChill@lemdro.id 0 points 1 year ago

The rich and the party cadres

[-] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

They forced farmers to grow indigo crops instead of natural cotton/wheat/rice.

[-] Bondrewd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Im pretty sure that was not during the drought itself, nor really caused it. It economically made sense and then probably exacerbated the famine.

[-] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It wasn't just the drought. Indigo cropping destroyed the soil first, drought exacerbated the problems.

[-] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

All famines are crop failures. That's kinda how famines happen.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

No

A famine is a widespread scarcity of food,[1][2] caused by several factors including war, natural disasters, crop failure, widespread poverty, an economic catastrophe or government policies.

[-] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I suppose you can consider getting your crops blown up a crop failure

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
1323 points (94.0% liked)

Comic Strips

12509 readers
3498 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS