107
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by outrageousmatter@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Let's welcome the new moderators of c/politics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aidan@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

So the German Communist Party were Nazis?

After the Nazi electoral breakthrough in the 1930 Reichstag election, the SPD proposed a renewed united front with the KPD against fascism but this was rejected.[25]

In the early 1930s, the KPD cooperated with the Nazis in attacking the social democrats, and both sought to destroy the liberal democracy of the Weimar Republic.[26] They also followed an increasingly nationalist course, trying to appeal to nationalist-leaning workers.[4][27]

In 1931, the party reported a membership of 200,000.[28]

The KPD leadership initially first criticised but then supported the 1931 Prussian Landtag referendum, an unsuccessful attempt launched by the far-right Stahlhelm to bring down the social democrat state government of Prussia by means of a plebiscite; the KPD referred to the SA as "working people's comrades" during this campaign.[29]

In this period, while also opposed to the Nazis, the KPD regarded the Nazi Party as a less sophisticated and thus less dangerous fascist party than the SPD, and KPD leader Ernst Thälmann declared that "some Nazi trees must not be allowed to overshadow a forest [of social democrats]".[30] In February 1932, Thälmann argued that “Hitler must come to power first, then the requirements for a revolutionary crisis [will] arrive more quickly”. In November 1932, the KPD and the Nazis worked together in the Berlin transport workers’ strike.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wow. Neat pro-nazi talking points. Do you think this is a good look for the moderation team?

I'd say the German Communist Party didn't know any better and learned the hard way what happens when you welcome nazis. It's interesting how none of your examples are from after 1932. I wonder what could have happened in 1933 that caused the sudden cutoff.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Neat pro-nazi talking points.

How is that pro-nazi? My personal ideology is essentially in opposition to Nazi ideology in every possible matter.

I'd say the German Communist Party didn't know any better

Not what I asked. You said marching with Nazis automatically makes you a Nazi, regardless of if they kill you later or not. So were they Nazis or not.

It's interesting how none of your examples are from after 1932.

Interesting how you didn't answer, were they Nazis?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My personal ideology is essentially in opposition to Nazi ideology in every possible matter.

Essentially? Wow, you can't even pretend to oppose nazis without wormy equivocation.

Not what I asked. You said marching with Nazis automatically makes you a Nazi, regardless of if they kill you later or not. So were they Nazis or not.

In this day and age it is. Certainly in the context of the unite the right nazi rally it is, which is what we were talking about. I can't fault fools who didn't know any better. Everyone knows they're the baddies now. Everyone at that rally knew exactly what they were about.

Interesting how you didn’t answer, were they Nazis?

The nazis didn't seem to think so, since they built Dachau to kill them. But yeah, have your stupid little gotcha. You're so clever.

headpats.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Essentially? Wow, you can't even pretend to oppose nazis without wormy equivocation.

Yeah because I think even Nazis would agree with me that random murder should be a crime or at least some people should have access to clean drinking water. I assume you agree with that too.

I can't fault fools who didn't know any better. Everyone knows they're the baddies now. Everyone at that rally knew exactly what they were about.

I think you overestimate how many people are obsessed with internet politics.

The nazis didn't seem to think so, since they built Dachau to kill them.

I didn't ask if they thought so I asked if you did.

Also, stop being patronizing, it's not funny it's just rude.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think you overestimate how many people are obsessed with internet politics.

The nazis at the rally were chanting nazi slogans and carrying torches. They were not immediately removed from the rally. They were not removed at all. It was obvious to even the most casual observer that it was a nazi rally. Anyone marching in a nazi rally is a nazi. Even when Trump calls them "very fine people" and unconvincingly walks it back.

Now go ahead and pretend that fools who didn't know any better in the 30s are equivalent to people in 2017 who should have known better but marched with nazis anyway. You seem to be under the impression that it's a good look.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

The nazis at the rally were chanting nazi slogans and carrying torches.

Most people don't know Nazi slogans or associate torches with Nazis.

It was obvious to even the most casual observer that it was a nazi rally.

How can you know if those who don't recognize it you call them Nazis and dismiss what they perceived?

You seem to be under the impression that it's a good look.

I didn't say it was a good look? It's not like I was there.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Most people don’t know Nazi slogans or associate torches with Nazis.

How can you know if those who don’t recognize it you call them Nazis and dismiss what they perceived?

The chanting of "Jews will not replace us" doesn't exactly leave room for doubt. Neither did the nazi flags.

Keep making excuses for nazis. It's obvious what sort of bar this is.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
107 points (88.5% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3859 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS