84
submitted 2 years ago by pingveno@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago

I think the sick days were the sticking point for the unions that did not approve provisional deal. So this reads to me like this:

Side with the megacorps - pass the first bill

Side with the 'economy' - pass both bills (temporary benefit for most workers)

Side with workers - pass neither bill, pass a new bill giving them higher benefits than requested to show rail companies that they can't play fast and loose with infrastructure and expect any support

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

From perusing /r/railroading, it sounds like they're okay with the outcome, if not overly enthusiastic. The real problem may be yet to come. The Senate still has yet to approve this, and Republicans can filibuster the bill that includes sick days.

[-] dhtseany@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Still though, the point remains that we wouldn't be in this spot to begin with if the critical rail road workers weren't being consistently nickel-and-dime'd by the mega-corp rail companies.

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2022
84 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7212 readers
368 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS