22
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)
privacy
1 readers
1 users here now
Rules (WIP)
- No ad hominem allowed
- Attack the idea, not the poster
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is why I push others towards Signal for communication. Only myself and them will have record of what was said and I make them disappear after 4 weeks.
Yeah but can you trust the people you talk with not to install shitty stupid apps, or click on stupid links that compromise their device that then lead to accesa to your measages and phone number?
You can't, but the threat exists regardless of what service you use.
Regarding my phone number being leaked, I'm okay with that risk. It's relatively easy to ignore/block unknown contacts and I'm not in any threat should someone discover it. For anyone who absolutely needs anonymity, they may want to wait until user names are rolled out and use another service for now.
For anyone who absolutely needs anonymity, simplex may already be better.
What’s important when you’d like to have absolute privacy or anonymity is, to realize that you can’t. “Use this, and no one can read your message.” is a typical mistake. “This service is world most secure” etc. is just a lie. Anyone who claims that privacy can be simple/easy is either a liar or doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
A rare example of honest/true statements, on the other hand, can be seen on the Cock.li website: http://rurcblzhmdk22kttfkel2zduhyu3r6to7knyc7wiorzrx5gw4c3lftad.onion/
In this specific case about the US, though, what’s most important is obviously to somehow stop this unconstitutional surveillance by the government (only making AT&T happy and rich). Please, don’t waste a lot of money to invade normal people’s privacy when you already have trillions of debts 😢
While I agree with your statement in general, I think its still early and dangerous to be recommending simplex as a viable alternative. It hasn't stood the test of time nor been independently audited. I'm keeping my eye on it as it seems like a viable alternative, but I'd hesitate to recommend it to anyone who may be at risk.
Hence the "may already..." depending on use case obviously. You can't really recommend anything to someone who may be at risk, certainly not Signal. Not that I have anything against Signal (I use it daily and have been for years) but anonymous it isn't, not in big part of the world anyway.