775
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 20 points 1 year ago

70% of what?

If that's subscription revenue in Uruguay then the business model is just not feasible, unless they up the subscription fees to adequately cover costs.

This is the risk when the revenue model doesn't scale with th cost model.

[-] verysoft@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

70% per dollar apparently. It's mostly large record labels taking the lion share though I think, independent artists make pennies.

[-] Quatity_Control@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

95% of the royalty pool goes to 200000 artists who generate 15% of the content. Sounding less fair the more you look at it.

[-] blueson@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On a platform like Spotify I don't really see the issue here.

Have you ever looked through the other 85% of the content? Excluding finding some obscure hits, most of it is trash.

Unless we want to argue that any art in our current economical system should be of equal value no matter what.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
775 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32321 readers
813 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS