120
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The unexpectedly meaty win for controversial, hard-right politician Geert Wilders in Wednesday's general election in the Netherlands set international headlines on fire.

Right-wing nationalists across Europe rushed to congratulate the populist politician, sometimes dubbed the Dutch Trump - partly for his dyed, bouffant-like hairdo, and partly for his famously firebrand rhetoric.

Geert Wilders' publicly expressed views - including linking Muslim immigration with terrorism and calling for a ban on mosques and the Quran - are so provocative that he has been under tight police protection since 2004.

Wilders was convicted of inciting discrimination, although later acquitted, and he was refused entry to the UK back in 2009.

But Europe's far right believes their views have now become more mainstream.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gerryflap@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago

I'm Dutch and afaik right-wing media doesn't play a role. The reason is quite simple, it's because the previous coalitions lead by the neoliberal VVD have consistently fucked everyone who isn't rich (and even some who are). Especially the crises that they've caused have completely eroded trust in the previously big parties. Some of these issues I'll lost below.

In the northern province of Groningen houses started getting damaged die to earthquakes caused by government-funded natural gas extraction. The whole country got rich of of this for decades, but when the people of Groningen needed money to repair their homes they sometimes had to fight for years to get anything.

The tax agency started incorrectly marking people as fraudsters for claiming certain benefits, which often put these people in debt for thousands of euros. This has ruined the life's of hundreds of people, yet the government initially just ignored it. While these people lost everything they had, the government seemed to do everything it could to avoid paying or helping. At some point they did start paying and pretending to help, but for many victims this was simply too little to late.

And then there's plenty of other issues that erroded trust as well. Years of ignoring "the nitrogen problem" until it was too late and lead to all kinds of issues. The farmers (who are the biggest cause of this issue) suddenly become the target of the government, which they obviously didn't like. This caused huge protests and the rapid growth of parties like the BBB and probably also the PVV. And there's also a housing crisis, where buying houses is impossible.

In short: the previous normal coalitions kept fucking up, until people seemingly had enough. There were other alternatives to the PVV, but apparently voting on a right -wing extremist who has all the ideas is easier than voting left-wing for many people here. I hope the damage stays limited, but this is truly a dark day for our country.

[-] dlatch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I'm Dutch and afaik right-wing media doesn't play a role.

I take it you haven't looked at the Telegraaf or PowNews the last months? They definitely played a role.

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Ongehoord Nederland as well

[-] Cosmicomical@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

Who does nothing breaks nothing. Don't be so hard on the left wing parties. Progress requires experimentation, it isn't always a easy to figure out all the ramifications of a new policy.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Neolibs aren't leftists and they don't experiment, unless it's to find a new way to steal from us and give to the rich.

[-] Cosmicomical@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm well aware of that, and far from defending neoliberals. I seriously can't reconstruct my thought process when i posted this, sorry. But I was defending actual leftists, i wasn't trying to represent neolibs as leftists. Any chance the original post was edited? Or maybe I just misunderstood something.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Let's just call them capitalists or conservatives instead of their false branding

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Neoliberal is good enough for Chomsky.

I'd say they'd prefer to be called Capitalists, Conservatives (or even Centrists, weirdly)

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah true it's weird that a linguistic expert like Chomsky kind of submits to such manipulation of language

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
120 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39347 readers
2412 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS