I tried to correct someone's grammar and someone else wrote a multi-paragraph response on why "should of" is an acceptable alternative to "should have".

Best interaction of my life, unironically

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The best part is their autocorrect changed it to "should have", so they said something like "should have is just as correct as should have"

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

Damn, I remember that discussion.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Just curious, what was the main gist of their argument?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Kind of like the more proper "hell of" instead of "hella."