172
Google is the master of fake Privacy features - gHacks Tech News
(www.ghacks.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
172 points (97.3% liked)
Privacy
4027 readers
1 users here now
A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy
Rules:
- Be civil
- No spam posting
- Keep posts on-topic
- No trolling
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, it annoys me to no end. First, they tried to convince the industry that users don't want privacy, they want security, because somehow privacy would not be just one discipline underneath security.
And now that privacy has won, that even lawmakers have understood that it's something that users need and should be able to demand, now they're completely flipping their messaging on its head. Suddenly, they're all about privacy. Except, of course, that they're fucking lying.
The only solution is to break them up. There is no other way - Google will keep perverting and manipulating social trends as long as they're allowed to hold onto their position.
The web browser is the most important piece of software in the world. It should not be under the control of a single company - especially when that company is a massive monopolist with extreme conflicts of interest.
The web (and the entire internet) was built on standards. It is time to go back to multiple parties working together on standards. Not a single, monopolistic implementation.
(Google isn't the only company that needs to be broken up by the way, but they're definitely the most urgent.)
Take the IP Protection "feature". They hide your IP address from individual sites while hoovering up all of the user's data into their own servers, to use for their own ends.
Privacy hasn't been enhanced, if anything it's been weakened by giving one company a log of everything done through the browser. So, it's a fucking lie
Ah, I didn't think anyone concerned about privacy used Chrome. But yes, for Chrome users it's an improvement
Well, with that proxying feature, I mostly meant that they're not doing it for the privacy, but rather for those other benefits.
Much like with 8.8.8.8 for DNS and AMP for the server-side, this feature locks down the client-side, ensuring that internet traffic goes over their infrastructure.
Yes, user privacy is short-term somewhat improved, because their competitors can't track you quite as easily anymore, but if they truly cared about improving privacy/security, there would be so many much lower hanging fruits they could pick, like end-to-end-encryption for Chrome Sync by default. They don't pick those, because it would impact their own ability to invade user privacy.