375
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

If Trump loses the nomination he'll simply return to Mar-a-Lago and 'carp and moan and complain,' said Christie

Chris Christie doesn't expect Donald Trump to concede if he loses any primary election.

The former New Jersey governor was discussing focusing his campaign efforts on New Hampshire with Jonathan Karl on "This Week" when he was asked if he believes Trump would concede in a primary he loses.

"I don't care," Christie responded.

He explained "no one will expect" Trump to concede based on the fact that he still hasn't publicly admitted he lost the 2020 presidential election — or given up his unfounded claims of widespread election fraud.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pottedmeat7910@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

Ooh, I bet that was painful to type out. It kinda stung just looking at it.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 12 points 11 months ago

At least he's still dumb enough to make his campaign about a different candidate instead of himself.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 months ago

I agree but it wasn't that long ago that all these asshats were slobbing on his knob. You don't get to help create a modern day Hitler and then when it's convenient come out like you were always Anti Hitler. I'm happy for you that it's suddenly beneficial to barely do the right thing but you shouldn't be celebrated for shit.

I know you're not celebrating him specifically but it seems that's what the media is focusing on. Fuck all these traitors. Being the best traitorous anti American fuckboy isn't quite the win one would think it is.

[-] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 11 months ago

It doesn’t matter. He has no chance of winning anything. Regardless of the shitty things he’s done, I appreciate that he’s calling out Trump now. Republican voters need to hear it from Republicans and I don’t really care how the media paints Christie as long as they deliver the message. Trump is a bigger threat than ever. Most candidates either support him or tiptoe around without acknowledging how dangerous he is. We need someone to take him head on. Frankly, it’s better when those people are former supporters who got to see things up close.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

So you'd prefer to keep this divide going? If once supporting Trump is unforgivable, then push will come to shove at some point because there's still millions that think or thought Trump was a stand up guy.

What's the best case scenario you see for current and previous Trump supporters?

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Current? There is no best case. They have seen all the evidence and believe no matter what he is the chosen one. It's delusion and suicide cult behavior.

As for former? I think that's relative. I know people who voted for Trump because they thought he was someone and he turned out to be someone else. Yes it's a little silly that they couldn't see he was exactly who he presented himself as. But that I can mostly forgive if you are repentant.

If you schemed at the highest levels of government to protect him and spent years defending him with each mounting crime? No. Go fuck yourself. You should be next in line behind him to go to jail. Of course that won't happen. But I'll be damned if I'll ever accept any reality where those sorts can pretend like nothing bad happened and all is well.

In a perfect world all these people would get voted out. Best case for me is they simply get relegated to a small minority in government that ceases to have any real power.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

He has little choice - he keeps getting questions about Trump. He has to address's them.

Be glad he and Romney are fighting back, even if it is too little too late.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
375 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3676 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS