14
submitted 9 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

The article ends with saying that a 4-day work week will solve the problem, but it won't.

The issue isn't that Rebecca from the article needs to work 70+ hours, and they would be completely fine if it was "only" 64 hours. The issue is stated plainly in a quote earlier on in the article; Salaries have not increased at the same pace as the cost of living. No one should need to work 2 jobs in order to survive. Going from 70+ hours to 40 would be a much bigger change in the lives of the people in the article.

[-] markev@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Also, they assume that employers will be happy to reduce the hours worked while keeping the same wages. That'd be wonderful but unrealistic.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
14 points (71.9% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
528 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS