999

Image Transcription:

A tweet from the George Takei Twitter account which states:

"A Democrat was in the White House when my family was sent to the internment camps in 1941. It was an egregious violation of our human and civil rights.

It would have been understandable if people like me said they’d never vote for a Democrat again, given what had been done to us.

But being a liberal, being a progressive, means being able to look past my own grievances and concerns and think of the greater good. It means working from within the Democratic party to make it better, even when it has betrayed its values.

I went on to campaign for Adlai Stevenson when I became an adult. I marched for civil rights and had the honor of meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. I fought for redress for my community and have spent my life ensuring that America understood that we could not betray our Constitution in such a way ever again.

Bill Clinton broke my heart when he signed DOMA into law. It was a slap in the face to the LGBTQ community. And I knew that we still had much work to do. But I voted for him again in 1996 despite my misgivings, because the alternative was far worse. And my obligation as a citizen was to help choose the best leader for it, not to check out by not voting out of anger or protest.

There is no leader who will make the decision you want her or him to make 100 percent of the time. Your vote is a tool of hope for a better world. Use it wisely, for it is precious. Use it for others, for they are in need of your support, too."

End Transcription.

The last paragraph I find particularly powerful and something more people really should take into account.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

oh if it's that simple then lets just do that. surely we can bang it out in a weekend.

[-] haikunaaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago

Thinking like this is the reason the 2 party system is still in place today

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

It is possible to fight for RCV while working within the system we have in the meantime.

[-] haikunaaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Strictly voting only means you're complacent in the system, more needs to be done if we ever wanna see any real progress.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Of course, but you should also vote for the lesser of two evils come election time.

[-] haikunaaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

That's exactly my point. Do both.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

thinking realistically about the likelihood of getting ~= 80 million people to vote for any one third party, or thinking realistically about the likelihood of getting those two parties to agree to vote their own power away?

[-] haikunaaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

See, that's the issue, you're thinking within the bounds of voting. There's other stuff you can do, like community outreach, or talking to local politicians, or protesting. Real change in America was never won with a vote, it was fought for on the streets.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Who says I'm not doing that too?

[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yes, regularly. I'm active in labor organizing, have walked picket lines with people who would go on to be US senators, make and give care packages to homeless people on the street and volunteer at my local food pantry. I've helped organize letter writing campaigns to get the tipped minimum wage raised and to get higher wages from the state for people who work in support services for adults with developmental challenges. I've flyered the parking lots of restaurants that were fighting the unemployment claim of a pregnant woman they fired without cause in an effort to pressure them to drop the case. I've protested outside town halls and other political events like that since 2001. I don't owe you my bona fides at all, but here they are. The idea that you can't be a good progressive unless you abandon the only meaningful resistance available against someone who is openly trying to dismantle democracy is simply horseshit. Trump played this same game against Clinton in 2016 and it worked. He actively campaigned for people who might have voted for her to stay home. "she's not a real progressive", "they're all the same anyway", "she's got this in the bag", etc. I absolutely DO NOT volunteer myself and my family to be sacrificed to some twitter communist's ideological purity test. You do the job that's in front of you, and the job that's in front of us right now is preventing another Trump presidency. Don't be a fucking Republican psyop.

[-] Algaroth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hell yeah! That's what I'm talking about! Preach! This is the fire!

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

You don't need 80 million people to vote third party.

What you need is enough votes to show as a big enough blip on the election results to make both the Democrats and Republicans sweat out of fear they may be losing their iron grip.

Change will soon follow

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

How many would you estimate you need and what's the plan to get them?

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody said it was simple, but yes. Let’s do that.

Doing the easy thing is what’s got us to where we are.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

can you pull it off in under a year? because in a year we're gonna have a presidential election and one of the leading candidates is someone whose already been determined by a court to have engaged in insurrection and has said that he'll have the military suppress protests starting day one and will replace 50,000 government functionaries with people whose only qualification is that they're loyal to him personally. his friends tell me every day that god has commanded them to kill me 😀

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I would surmise it would take between 15 and 40 years to get it passed.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if we’d started pushing for this in earnest 15 years ago.

Like they say, the second best time to plant a tree is today.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
999 points (100.0% liked)

196

16729 readers
2767 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS