How do I convince my company to add tests for FE? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 11 months ago by nitefox@sh.itjust.works to c/programming@programming.dev

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We are in a very funny situation where I just spent two weeks fixing FE bugs and there are so many left. I asked to add integration tests but the answer was “no”, cause we can’t test the UI and all of that.

So the proposed solution was to be more careful, except I’m careful but testing whole website parts or the whole website is not feasible. What can I do?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

You need to create a list of incidents that reached customers. Create a matrix that has the incident ID, the link to the incident documentation and the type of test that would have caught the incident.

Then they'll see that their incidents would have been caught by the tests you want to. push instead of an angry customer.

[-] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

They know. We have had a production website being literally unusable, sucking up a lot of resources for a bug.

We have a client which is MAD cause the project is riddled with bugs, but the solution somehow is paying more attention. Except that it clearly isn't feasible to pay more attention when you have to check, recheck and check again the same thing over and over... They say it's a waste cause you can't catch UI, and you will spend the same amount of time NOT writing tests; obviously this is all crap, but they somehow think they are smarter than google or any other small or big company that do write test

[-] lysdexic@programming.dev 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We have a client which is MAD cause the project is riddled with bugs, but the solution somehow is paying more attention. Except that it clearly isn’t feasible to pay more attention when you have to check, recheck and check again the same thing over and over…

By definition, automated testing means paying more attention, and doing it so well that the process is automated.

They say it’s a waste cause you can’t catch UI (...)

Show them a working test that's catching UI bugs. It's hard to argue against facts.

but they somehow think they are smarter than google or any other small or big company that do write test

Don't sell a solution because others are doing it. Sell a solution because it's a solution to the problem they are experiencing, and it's in their best interests to solve it. Appeals to authority don't work on everyone.

[-] Cralder@feddit.nu 6 points 11 months ago

Show them a working test that's catching UI bugs. It's hard to argue against facts.

Ooooh you wouldn't believe how easy it is for some people to argue against facts.

load more comments (2 replies)

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023

56 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

17314 readers

216 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz