421
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
421 points (98.8% liked)
Android
27909 readers
30 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
We are Android girls*,
In our Lemmy.world.
The back is plastic,
It's fantastic.
*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.
Our Partner Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Unfamiliar with Nestle and water? They'd try for oxygen, I bet.
The Lorax
The GPL explicitly allows selling the software, like a proprietary software product. You don't even need to have the code up in a public repo. What you DO need to do, though, is provide a reasonable way for customers to get the source code, and send it to them if they ask. Just because a project is GPL doesn't mean you're entitled to the source for free. Of course, if someone buys it and requests the source, they can do whatever they want with it, including uploading it somewhere. Which in the end, essentially makes it available to everyone. Which is the whole point!
All of this only works if the owners of the code respect the license. In this particular case, I don't believe a contributor agreement was ever created, so if the new owners want to close source the apps, they'll have to get permission from all contributors, or drastically rewrite those contributions.
But again, this only matters if they respect the license in the first place...
This is probably a silly question but how do you think open source development works and what is adequate compensation?