Mormon - m = Moron
Mormon - m = Oro
Did you mean oron?
I can’t tell if that is a purposeful typo or not.
mormon - 5*n = Oro
Technically it'd need to be:
mormon / 2m = oron
A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B)
You're right, that would be more technically correct.
If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn
Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron
Perhaps...
Mormon - m + e = oreo
Windows user detected. You're so ~~case~~-insensitive, ba-dum-tss.
Oro+a-o= ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA!!!!
the remainder n needs to be accounted for
The n stands for nothing, therefore it's invisible.
Math ✔️'s out.
Mormon - m = m (Moron - 1)
Or... ormon... oron
Mormon - m = Moron
Mormon - m = Oro
Did you mean oron?
I can’t tell if that is a purposeful typo or not.
mormon - 5*n = Oro
Technically it'd need to be:
mormon / 2m = oron
A word isn't a product of letters, that would made mormon = nomorm, but an ordered set, where the subtract operation gives you the first set without any element also found on the second set (in set notation A-B = A-(A intersection B)
You're right, that would be more technically correct.
If words are an ordered set, then mormon = morn
Words are a base 27 integer. (mormon - mon) / a000 + on = moron
Perhaps...
Mormon - m + e = oreo
Windows user detected.
You're so ~~case~~-insensitive, ba-dum-tss.
Oro+a-o= ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA!!!!
the remainder n needs to be accounted for
The n stands for nothing, therefore it's invisible.
Math ✔️'s out.
Mormon - m = m (Moron - 1)
Or... ormon... oron