14
submitted 11 months ago by agrammatic@feddit.de to c/citylife@beehaw.org

Where scrappy Berlin shines as the A+ example

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago

The best solution. No fares. Government provided infrastructure shouldn't be gated by cost. You then are essentially saying poor people can't have access to these things because they don't pay enough taxes and that's literally the opposite of why we have taxes and governments. If the point was to only serve those with money we'd just need businesses. Not also governments.

[-] StereoTypo@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

It raises an interesting question; if it were feasible to implent without massive privacy concerns, would you support income-proportional fee structure for government services? I'm imagining below a certain cutoff income-bracket, everything would be free.

[-] agrammatic@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

income-proportional fee structure for government services?

This is income tax.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

City Life

2113 readers
1 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS