14
submitted 11 months ago by agrammatic@feddit.de to c/citylife@beehaw.org

Where scrappy Berlin shines as the A+ example

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago

The best solution. No fares. Government provided infrastructure shouldn't be gated by cost. You then are essentially saying poor people can't have access to these things because they don't pay enough taxes and that's literally the opposite of why we have taxes and governments. If the point was to only serve those with money we'd just need businesses. Not also governments.

[-] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

Imagine all the fare inspectors you don't have to pay, all the fare collection equipment and technology, contracts to software companies to make and integrate a mobile app, credit card processing fees...

[-] StereoTypo@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

It raises an interesting question; if it were feasible to implent without massive privacy concerns, would you support income-proportional fee structure for government services? I'm imagining below a certain cutoff income-bracket, everything would be free.

[-] MJBrune@beehaw.org 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, I would in the terms that taxes are literally that. Our taxes pay for the service, you shouldn't need to pay again to use it. You already paid for it. I wouldn't replace taxes with a proportional fee structure either. This is what living in a society is. Sometimes you'll put money towards something that you'll never use, sometimes you'll use something far more than what you paid for. A government and really, a society, or community is only as inversely strong (weak?) as its most selfish person. I've seen a lot of people recently who are applying logic that they wouldn't give 100 starving people a meal if one of them didn't "deserve" it. We need to fix this mentality or we are doomed as a society and frankly, with that line of thinking, I'd question why government bodies even exist since the people pay most of the taxes.

[-] agrammatic@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

income-proportional fee structure for government services?

This is income tax.

[-] Rentlar@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

Caltrain and Metrolink (California, USA regional trains) have the right idea. Low income Americans by and large carry EBT cards. They give a 50% discount on tickets when scanned. Of course this could be technologically easily made free but it's a start and the remaining challeges are financial and political.

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Why not just have taxes pay for them, and no fares? That even encourages more people to use it, since you're paying for it anyways.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

City Life

2113 readers
1 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS