128
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Personally I'm about as willing to trust this as WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption, given Meta/Facebook's involvement, but thought it was worth keeping folks here apprised of the situation in the corporate space.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Has WhatsApp's encryption ever been shown to not be trustworthy?

Facebook has had to provide law enforcement with FB Messenger texts before after being served a warrant. Are you saying this has also happened with WhatsApp, even though that should be impossible? That's a pretty big claim, so I'd love to see your evidence.

[-] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

To my knowledge, it hasn't, but that's not the main point of my comment so much as expressing my distrust of the parent company. In that respect, no, I'm not aiming to make a claim that Meta/Facebook have had to disclose messages from WhatsApp to law enforcement and essentially undermine its end-to-end-encryption.

Nevertheless, I think it's reasonable and fair to be suspicious of Meta/Facebook given its history of questionable actions concerning people's data. They're in the business of using people's data for marketing/advertising purposes, not safeguarding it, after all.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago
  1. It’s Facebook

  2. It’s closed source

Zero trust from me, not touching any of that

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

So, no evidence. Gotcha.

For WhatsApp, given how much noise the UK law enforcement has been making about trying to ban encryption, I'm inclined to believe it actually is working. I'm sure Facebook does some metadata analysis and that does feed back into their advertising profiles, but that's a different thing from being able to turn over actual message content that's supposedly been encrypted over to law enforcement.

But hey, if you do find actual evidence, I'm all ears.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

I’m not the person you responded to, so I made no claims that need any evidence.

I just love shitting on fucking rubbish Facebook and will do so online at any point possible.

Fuck yo evidence and fuck yo Facebook

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Most people don't so openly state that they don't care about facts or evidence and form their beliefs primarily from vibes, so thanks for at least being upfront about it.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee -3 points 11 months ago

The evidence we have is the historic behaviour of Facefuck and Zuckerfuck.

Fuck anything connected to this asshole.

They could easily scan your messages via the app before encrypting.

Being closed source we have no way to examine this.

But yea, keep on trusting an org that has repeatedly demonstrated they're untrustworthy.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

In case you were unaware, you come off as a literal child. Cheers.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
128 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

59205 readers
2893 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS