1731
submitted 11 months ago by kpw@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

The key difference here is that you only own the copy when the copyright holder sells it to you

Right, I should own my copy. I have purchased this copy and it's mine now. It's bullshit for a store to say "now that we no longer sell the thing your purchased previously you're not allowed to own it anymore."

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Ownership is one condition that a copyright holder might offer, but that's not guaranteed. Video rental shops would allow unlimited consumption for a limited time period, for example. We can argue all day about the differences and what consumers want versus the conditions under which content producers currently operate. I am personally also extremely frustrated by that, and I vote with my wallet: I do not subscribe to services that I find too restrictive or too expensive.

Where I am in the minority, however, is my position that copyright infringement is illegal, unethical and can in any way be legitimized.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
1731 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2626 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS