Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

15037 readers

3 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate. This is strongly encouraged!

Cross-posting

!everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
!selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Zoe8338@lemmy.ml

dogmuffins@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

Secure Image sharing (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 years ago by lemontree@lemm.ee to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does anyone know of a service (ideally docker image - probably with app) that can be used to securely share family pictures?

The idea is, that some relatives don't respect wishes of not posting to social media and to prevent this we want to securely share images they can look at but not do anything else with.

Even if I send an image to my mom and she knows not to post anywhere, maybe my aunt wants to see that picture, asks my mom to send it to her and then she posts it, without us knowing.

Probably only works with an app because a browser can't block screenshots.

Is there anything like this out there? Doesn't have to by anything special. Just a web backend for us to upload pictures and a client (probably through a URL) that can then browse them without allowing for screenshots, sharing, downloading, etc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You would need a locked down device and be physically present at the viewing. Otherwise they can just take a photo of the photo with their phone and share that.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Am I the only one that gets how fucking sus this inquiry is? If they had thought it through like they claim they would have come to all these conclusions on their own both yours and mine.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe this is the solution. If they can't be trusted to behave, they'll be able to see the pictures at the next family gathering.