How do we feel about federating with Threads? (kbin.social)

submitted 11 months ago by ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social to c/AskKbin@kbin.social

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Threads seems to be beginning to test ActivityPub federation, and since Kbin can be used for microblogging, this affects kbin.social. What are your thoughts on federating or defederating with them?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] livus@kbin.social 25 points 11 months ago

I'm strongly against it because of Embrace Extend Extinguish.

I'd encourage everyone to read How To Kill A Decentralized Network like the Fediverse if you haven't already.

I think Meta's history reveals it to be a bad actor and I don't think their intentions here are above board.

[-] CoffeeAddict@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Microsoft put that theory in practice with the release of Windows 2000 which offered support for the Kerberos security protocol. But that protocol was extended. The specifications of those extensions could be freely downloaded but required to accept a license which forbid you to implement those extensions. As soon as you clicked "OK", you could not work on any open source version of Kerberos. The goal was explicitly to kill any competing networking project such as Samba.

This is a great article describing exactly how Meta can control the fediverse and destroy smaller instances with anti-competitve practices.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023

19 points (100.0% liked)

Moving to: m/AskMbin!

5 readers

1 users here now

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

founded 1 year ago