69
[Discussion] Pre-emptive Threads defederation (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by ruplicant@sh.itjust.works to c/agora@sh.itjust.works
98 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Should sh.itjust.works preemptively defederate from Threads?

Threads is the not-so-new ~~reddit-like~~ twitter-like public forum platform by Meta, the same commercial company behind internet behemoths like Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp. They're working on ActivityPub integration so that they can bridge (federate?) with the fediverse. As far as I know, the focus is on Mastodon instances, but in the future that could include Lemmy instances too.

Some have raised the question, worried about the future of the fediverse or even claiming that it goes against its definition.

What do you think should be done?

EDIT: correction

EDIT.2: The Vote is on! Go make your voice heard. You have until Friday the 29th.

Fediverse instances' status on federation with Threads

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

What do you see as the risks to the larger fediverse in having Meta federated?

What benefit does Meta hope to see?

[-] ruplicant@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What do you see as the risks to the larger fediverse in having Meta federated?

for me the main risk would be the loss of freedom, as in the open way it is developed. if threads is openly weaved to the fediverse, their closed development methodology will dictate it's future by virtue of its monopoly and the way for that future will not be defined by the interests of the larger community - as it generally is now with the fediverse's platforms and apps open standards

a second important risk is the quality of the conversation will likely drop abruplty. the dominance of the userbase will be too big too fast. i'd like for e.g. Lemmy to grow and keep on growing (not that i care that much about it) but i think this would not be the way to do it

What benefit does Meta hope to see?

the benefit any company seeks with any new product or implementation: to increase it's bottom-line, AKA money

how? one way is using everything that's going on in the fediverse as 'content' for their users - who they'd be "milking" for said bottom-line. and that content's upkeep, that would bring them said profit, would not cost them a thing

EDIT: grammar

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
69 points (97.3% liked)

The Agora

1598 readers
10 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
TheDude@sh.itjust.works
imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
Seraph089@sh.itjust.works