488
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 44 points 11 months ago

I guess this means the 2nd amendment crowd finally gets their opportunity to use their stockpiled guns against the government in a case like this? /s

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Yes, exactly right. You do not need the /s at all because that is the purpose of 2A.

[-] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago

that doesn't work though when at least half of the 2nd amendment supporters voted for fascism. What are they going to do, take up arms against the party they voted into power themselves?

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

This exactly. These fascists will point their guns squarely at liberals and Democrats in the name of their country.

Remember when Trump said he could shoot a person in Times Square and get away with it?

His supporters loved him for that because they want to do this too. They want to get away with murdering people.

Make no mistake: we will have another coup if Trump is "elected". The question is will there be enough people to stand up and rise against it.

I hate to say it but I'm not optimistic on that.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I am still curious how it works in their mind. They see troops deployed and they what exactly, random acts of terrorism? Like you look at the places that led successful guerilla campaigns against real militaries and they are all in places where real poverty is rampant. Not talking about you live in a trailer and work at Target. More like you grow opium in some valley in Afghanistan or rice in Vietnam. Remember the Bundy Ranch guys ordering takeout?

I can't see any gun owner I know just deciding to go live in the woods, willing to survive on what food they can salvage while getting their own kids to plant landmines.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Said no constitutional scholar not on the NRA's payroll.

[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Not /s, you're exactly right, you should move to the left and be prepared as well.

There's a lot of people sounding the alarm, but it seems liberals still don't believe what conservatives have been straight up telling them for years.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's weird that they won't come out and say, "My plan is to lie down and take it. But they better ask nicely if they want me on that train!"

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I plan to stick it out. My wife has dual citizenship and we are in the process of getting our kids the same. If it really comes down to it they can flee abroad. If we are at the point where the US is not letting people leave there is no point in prepping for anything.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

...insert a not like that meme here.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yep! And no, we won't be fighting tanks and drones. As with all politics, the fight will be local. We'll be fighting the local Committee for Public Safety, Brown Shirts, etc.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If you think the Brown Shirts won't magically get armored vehicles and air support then you didn't pay attention to the part where the Brown Shirts turned into the SS and Gestapo.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, but they start somewhere. And they are not starting in my hood.

[-] kool_newt@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Those in charge in the government are not dumb, they've learned over 100+ years how to propagandize those that want guns to not see them as the enemy. It's not a coincidence that the gun nuts are courted by the right.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
488 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2205 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS