789
Pragernant (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by themaninblack@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Wouldn't it also be greater than 1 for the same reason as OP? I think there are probably more babies in mothers than people missing testes.

[-] filgas08@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

but mothers don't have testicles

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago

Not their own, no, but the average number of testicles in a mother's body is greater than 0.

[-] MustrumR@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

But they have the testicles of their soon to be born sons.

I would say whether it's greater than 1 or lesser than 1 is inconclusive without accurate data .

You would need to find out whether amount of men with removed testicles is greater than amount of women pregnant with a boy (after the average week when testicles appear). Also men to women ratio in global population needs to be accounted for.

[-] Feyr@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's easy. The number of men missing testicles is not 50%

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
789 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
1657 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS