Communism101

1431 readers

1 users here now

This is a community for those who are new to or unfamiliar with communist, socialist or simply leftist philosophy. Ask basic questions here and learn about what we stand for!

Rules:

Keep things SFW!
Keep posts and comments civil.
Don't attack someone for not knowing "enough" about communism or leftism.
Civil discussion and debate is welcome, trolling and hate speech is not.
No racism, sexism, homophobia, inciting crime/violence, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

redjoker@lemmygrad.ml

FPGA@lemmygrad.ml

Should communists support the actor's strike? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by aloeha@lemmy.world to c/communism101@lemmygrad.ml

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I support the writer's guild strike because they are not part of the bourgeoisie. The same can't be said of a lot of these rich actors who own a ton of capital themselves. So on the one hand, it kind of seems like the bourgeoisie is fighting the bourgeoisie on this one. On the other hand, not every actor in the guild is as successful as Tom Cruise, so some of those striking actors are working class.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not really, because methods of production essentially create that money. For example what is more worthwhile? A machine that creates products worth 1 million dollars a year, or a million dollars cash? Obviously the machine as it allows a capitalist to essentially endlessly fill their pockets.

Capital trumps money every single time (money can also be used to purchase capital but itself is not capital). It can be used as investment as well, which acts as capital because it accumulates interest and return, turning it into productive capital. But money itself is not capital.