35
submitted 10 months ago by Atemu@lemmy.ml to c/nix@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] parens@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

The article clearly states otherwise

Flakes also are a symptom or cause of much intra-community strife between "pro-flakes" and "anti-flakes" factions

[-] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, that's easy -- that's utter bullshit. Article is generous, this is a blog post.

[-] parens@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

๐Ÿ˜‚ why do you believe that?

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Because I'm pretty active in the Nix community and have never seen a single anti-flakes comment anywhere. Plenty of people advocating for flakes, and those who don't use or understand flakes. But never anyone who actively dislikes them.

[-] parens@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago

OK, I see where you're coming from. You're interpreting "anti" as "dislike". Have you considered interpreting it as those who don't use and don't want to use flakes?

Just because there is disagreement, doesn't mean that it has to be tied to negative emotions like hate or dislike.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Well no, because that's not what "anti" means.

And one can absolutely use NixOS without using flakes, whether they're marked experimental or not. They're simply a way to make inputs declarative, rather than the nix-channel method which is imperative.

So there's no "disagreement" here either.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
35 points (94.9% liked)

Nix / NixOS

1765 readers
1 users here now

Main links

Videos

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS