64
submitted 1 year ago by masterspace@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] banana@communick.news 11 points 1 year ago

I am hopeful for small modular reactors (SMR's). They have the potential for significant construction cost savings, are less of a risk from terrorism/disaster, and can often be located closer to the load (long power lines lose power).

[-] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

There have been a number of studies that have SMRs are being as expensive or higher than conventional nuclear, with the added downside of higher levels of waste, anywhere from 2 to 30 times as much as conventional nuclear depending on the tech used.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2111833119

Part of the reason for scaling up reactors in the first place was the expectation that output would scale faster than costs. That hasn't really panned out to the extent expected.

[-] banana@communick.news 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing this, I didn't know how the waste compared to conventional nuclear.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
64 points (95.7% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
190 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS