132
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by loopy@lemm.ee to c/todayilearned@lemmy.ml

Sumerian cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphics, manuscripts in Aramaic, Arabic, and Hebrew, the illuminated Christian Gospels, the Talmud, the Koran—with these forms and collections of writing came the expectation that a person would read them out loud and would, in a manner of speaking, conjure their reality. In his book A History of Reading, Alberto Manguel points out that Aramaic and Hebrew, the “primordial” languages of the Bible, draw no distinction between reading and speaking. The same word stands for both. Buddhism and Hinduism also give an exalted place to the spoken word.

The opening words of The Odyssey—“Sing in me, Muse, and through me tell the story”—make this clear: The storyteller is acknowledging at the start that the tale he tells is not his own, and that he hopes for divine assistance in telling it well.

I think it is pretty interesting that people engaged with reading this way. The author of this article notes that it becomes a living story. This also had the benefit of reaching persons that could not read. I wonder if the content was remembered more vividly through both seeing and hearing the words.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] loopy@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

That’s interesting. I suppose it’s similar to having the radio or TV on the background at work.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

I may be wrong, but I remember a scene in Robert Redford's movie 'Havana' where the cigar makers are listening to Marx, until the owner walks in and the reader switches to a gossip magazine.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
132 points (99.3% liked)

Today I learned

7585 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS