163
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, it's not. The complaint is linked in the article, here is the first sentence:

For several years, Starbucks has subsidized its operations with significant customer cash inflows generated at least in part by using unfair and deceptive practices to manipulate its 33-million rewards program members into paying in advance for their purchase.

It goes on to describe dark patterns manipulating consumers into spending more than they would otherwise. You are describing one of the motivations for Starbucks to do so.

this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
163 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
239 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS